--- Joe Bohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We've been hitting some errors in the TCK tests that validate mgmt
> with
> MEJB. The main problem was that we were failing the name lookup:
>
> javax.naming.NameNotFoundException: Name
>
"java:openejb/Deployment/MEJBGBean/MEJB/javax.management.j2ee.Management"
>
> not found
>
> I thought this was strange because we don't include the MEJBGBean any
>
> longer in the geronimo assembly and I could find no reference to it
> in
> the Geronimo code at all.
>
> It turns out that we map to the "GBEAN" name when there is no
> mappedName
> specified in the Openejb code. In
> o.a.openejb.config.GeronimoMappedName
> at line 65 there is this piece of code which Geronimo is apparently
> very
> dependent upon
>
> if (null == mappedName && ref.getEjbRefName().equals("ejb/MEJB")) {
> ref.setMappedName("MEJBGBean/MEJB");
> }
I believe this code is there because the old MEJB was a plain
GBean. I am not very familiar with openejb code. This code is probably
not needed any more. If we do not want to release antoher openejb, we
could try making MEJBGBean a 'nop' EJB. This is not gong to be any less
ugly..
The following code in MEJBGBean (geronimo-openejb)
StatelessBean bean = ejbJar.addEnterpriseBean(new
StatelessBean("MEJB",MEJBBean.class.getName()));
can be modified to replace MEJBBean with a dummy class in
geronimo-openejb. I have not tested this...
If something can be changed in TCK that would be great.
Thanks
Anita
>
> So I assume the mappedName must always be null and we need to force
> this
> mapping for Geronimo?
>
> Once I modified the name to match the newly enabled MEJB app's id,
> "mejb/ejb/mgmt/MEJB", then I finally started to see failures that
> matched what Anita indicated we should see without the correct
> authorization.
>
> So what should we do with this openejb change? We were hoping to
> release Geronimo 2.0.2 with openejb 3.0-beta-1 which has the old name
>
> still included. There are probably other ways around this that would
>
> only require Geronimo (such as making the new name match the old name
>
> ... but that's really ugly) or perhaps TCK configuration changes.
> Any
> suggestions?
>
> Joe
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
Catch up on fall's hot new shows on Yahoo! TV. Watch previews, get listings,
and more!
http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/3658
