On 10/11/07, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The other thing I began thinking about was using the AMQ master/slave
> > functionality and just embedding the directory server in the master
> > and the slaves. This would mean less moving parts and we could make
> > any LDAP replications take place via AMQ transports.
>
> why would this be better than using the built in ldap replication?
> (mitosis in apacheds) This is not a leading question, I really don't
> know :-)
The only reason I said this is because I haven't yet looked at the
replication code in ApacheDS. I have looked at the marshaling code in
ActiveMQ and I know it is highly optimized and very well tested.
Bruce
--
perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)[EMAIL
PROTECTED]&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
);'
Apache ActiveMQ - http://activemq.org/
Apache ServiceMix - http://servicemix.org/
Apache Geronimo - http://geronimo.apache.org/
Castor - http://castor.org/
