No, the reorg was for post 1.0.0 discussion.The whole idea, is to get J2G out there as-is and get some real-world user feedback on it....
-Donald Lin Sun wrote:
The .project and .classpath files are used when the plugins are loaded in Eclipse IDE. You are right they don't have ASL license headers but I don't see license headers associated with these files normally. The files in the geronimo eclipse plugin don't have ASL license headers either. Also, these files are not in the assembly. I am not sure what we need to do with jboss here. Of course we are using it since it is a migration tool from jboss to geronimo. Any advice here? About the recent discussion, I don't remember anyone mentioned any action plans in any schedule, so I assume that is not an item for this 1.0 release. Lin On Nov 6, 2007 4:20 AM, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:What are they .project and .classpath files? They don't have ASL license headers... I assume JBoss is a trademarked name. We are using it in some file names and in some file contents. Are we handling this correctly? I don't know the answer off hand. There was a recent discussion about aggregating migration tools in a common devtools directory. Was there a consensus reached? --kevan On 11/2/07, Donald Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Starting discussion thread for Vote thread at - http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Release-J2G-1.0.0-RC1-tf4740253s134.html -Donald
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
