I don't have free nodes at hand. Thus only test building from source. The
build succeeds on my personal laptop. I am ok with that. +1

[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Reactor Summary:
[INFO]
[INFO] Apache Hama parent POM ............................ SUCCESS [3.219s]
[INFO] core .............................................. SUCCESS
[3:23.415s]
[INFO] graph ............................................. SUCCESS [39.063s]
[INFO] machine learning .................................. SUCCESS [6.820s]
[INFO] examples .......................................... SUCCESS
[1:09.465s]
[INFO] yarn .............................................. SUCCESS [3.524s]
[INFO] hama-dist ......................................... SUCCESS [7.358s]
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Total time: 5:33.308s
[INFO] Finished at: Sun Mar 31 22:46:54 CST 2013
[INFO] Final Memory: 27M/309M
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------



On 31 March 2013 12:22, Edward J. Yoon <edwardy...@apache.org> wrote:

> I've tested this RC on 4 nodes cluster. Everything looks good to me.
>
> +1
>
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Tommaso Teofili
> <tommaso.teof...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > Tommaso
> >
> >
> > 2013/3/29 Edward J. Yoon <edwardy...@apache.org>
> >
> >> Hello all,
> >>
> >> I've created a Hama 0.6.1-RC1. As we discussed yesterday, this RC
> >> fixes input partitioning issue and adds few random data generators.
> >>
> >> Please check whether this is stable enough for newbies to start Hama
> >> on their cluster, and vote!
> >>
> >> Hama 0.6.1 RC1:
> >> http://people.apache.org/~edwardyoon/dist/0.6.1-RC1/
> >>
> >> Tags:
> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hama/tags/0.6.1-RC1/
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
> >> @eddieyoon
> >>
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
> @eddieyoon
>

Reply via email to