Just let you know I may refactor based on the following diagram. http://people.apache.org/~chl501/diagram1.png
That sketches the basic flow required for ft. I am currently evaluate related parts, so it's subjected to change. On 24 February 2014 20:52, Edward J. Yoon <edwardy...@apache.org> wrote: > 0.6.4 or 0.7.0, Both are OK to me. > > Just FYI, > > The memory efficiency has been significantly (almost x2-3) improved by > runtime message serialization and compression. See > https://wiki.apache.org/hama/Benchmarks#PageRank_Performance_0.7.0-SNAPSHOT_vs_0.6.3 > (I'll attach more benchmarks and comparisons with other systems result > soon). And, we've fixed many bugs. e.g., K-Means, NeuralNetwork, > SemiClustering, Graph's Combiners HAMA-857. > > According to my personal evaluations, current system is fairly > respectable. As I mentioned before, I believe we should stick to > in-memory style since the today's machines can be equipped with up to > 128 GB. Disk (or disk hybrid) based queue is a optional, not a > must-have. > > Once we release this one, we finally might want to focus on below issues: > > * Fault tolerant job processing (checkpoint recovery) > * Support GPUs and InfiniBand > > Then, I think we can release version 1.0. > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 8:44 PM, Tommaso Teofili > <tommaso.teof...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Would you cut 0.7 or 0.6.4 ? >> I'd go with 0.6.4 as I think the next minor version change should be due to >> significant feature additions / changes and / or stability / scalability >> improvements. >> >> Regards, >> Tommaso >> >> >> 2014-02-24 8:47 GMT+01:00 Edward J. Yoon <edwardy...@apache.org>: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I plan on cutting a release next week. If you have some opinions, Pls feel >>> free to comment here. >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone > > > > -- > Edward J. Yoon (@eddieyoon) > Chief Executive Officer > DataSayer, Inc.
