On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> > + /* There's probably a better way to do this, but for the time > > being... > > + * > > + * Right now the parsing is very 'slack'. Actual rules from RFC > > 2069 are: > > The relevant spec is RFC 2617. Were there significant changes since 2069? Not in this section. Comma separation made clearer (but no explicit wording on white space eating) - and our old code was still at fault when isinsting that any non alpanumeric MUST be quoted. Dw
