> From: Bill Stoddard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 10 September 2002 22:23
>> [Moving to [EMAIL PROTECTED]] [...] >> I think max_index is misunderstood. allocator->max_index is the index of >> the biggest block available. index = block_size / boundary_size - 1, where >> boundary_size is 4096. Keeping track of max_index prevents us from scanning >> the entire array of free lists (of different block sizes). > > Code comment pretty please? I spent a very small bit of time in the > allocator code a few months back and gave up :-) Point taken. Will do. Sander
