Hi,
I don't know if it is the case, I think the best performance solution to achieve high scalability (10K connections per cpu unit) will be several sockets being handled by an unique thread, in a way we will have fewer running thread to attend more sockets connections.
[]s
_________________________________________
Eider Oliveira - UOL
ICQ#: 116119057 * Work Tel#: +55 11 3038-9492
________________________________________________
Um homem com um rel�gio sabe que horas s�o; um homem com
dois rel�gios nunca est� seguro. (Lei de Segal)
-----Original Message-----
From: Henri Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: segunda-feira, 13 de janeiro de 2003 09:42
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: socket multiplexor
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
> "Henri Gomez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>Hi to all,
>>
>>I wonder if someone of you have an idea where I to find a
>>permanents sockets multiplexor.
>>
>>Something like this is the jpolld used by some jabber site,
>>where x clients connections are routed to a single server,
>>on a single socket.
>>
>>I started to take a look to write on using APR but If something
>>allready exist ...
>
>
> I was looking into it last year... Performances are just BAD... :-)
Yes there may be a small loss in performance but I really need
something like this
