The Original Proposal was in March of this year: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=107918314400003&r=2&w=2
+1 Votes: Tom May Justin Erenkrantz Andrà Malo Erik Abele Jim Jagielski Bill Stoddard Joe Orton -1 Votes: Aaron Bannert Aaron said: > This will, at least for now, raise the bar to entry for contributors. While Subversion had recently become 1.0.0 back in March, I believe that Subversion Clients are available for most platforms now, and that the barrier to entry for subversion is not any higher than CVS for new contributors. Is this still a valid concern? A large portion of the thread was taken up by discussions about the various security features of subversion. I believe that it was generally agreed that Subversion is better than CVS in this respect, and further concerns should be taken to [EMAIL PROTECTED] What are the barriers to moving to Subversion? I believe we might as well do it now, before we start on a new stable branch (2.2). Time for another Vote? -Paul Querna
