Which reading part? I am not in a position to test right now but I think FastCGI never even required a file to exist on the local system, provided a proper handler was assigned to the request. But even if it does it's an implementation issue of mod_fastcgi, as FastCGI is just a data exchange protocol.
Bye, Ivan ----- Original Message ----- Subject: Re: RFC for a Perchild-like-MPM From: Gustavo A. Baratto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 26-11-2004 3:18 > > I think the only part missing right now is the ability to compile > > Apache to function as a FastCGI client, and accept requests over > > FastCGI instead of HTTP. That can be a full version of Apache, > > or a slimmed-down version (e.g. with no input/output filters). > > It is a great idea use FastCGI's process manager to spawn httpd processes. > FastCGI as it is now is ok when we need to execute stuff with another UID > other than the webserver's.... But it doesn't address the reading part, > which still have to be done by 'www' user... and this is a major problem.
