On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 10:28:43AM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > > > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 10:16:04AM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > mod_dbd is explicitly mentioned as a new feature of 2.2 > > > and, therefore, a compelling reason to upgrade. Either > > > we stop refering to mod_dbd as something special enough > > > to warrant special attention as a core enhancement or > > > we fix it so it *is* one. > > > > The fact that no one has ever cared to make mod_dbd work on Windows until > > the precise instance that we're to go to GA is complete evidence that this > > is not a showstopper. It's not even in the default build! > > > > It can wait until the next release of 2.2. We can note it in the release > > notes and move along. -- justin > > > > I would agree, as long as we remove it for the What's New > pages until it actually works and builds. > > My point, obviously, was that we can't have it both ways and > say mod_dbd is great and a new core enhancement if it doesn't > even build under Win32.
Win32 is not special. It's a second-class citizen if anything because it gets so little developer attention. joe
