The fact that no one has ever cared to make mod_dbd work on Windows until
the precise instance that we're to go to GA is complete evidence that this
is not a showstopper. It's not even in the default build!
I cared, when I recall mod_dbd was compiling with a former apr (pity I do
not know which version)
For me is a reason to upgrade is mod_authn_db (which relies on mod_dbd) .
When you guys go on with 2.2 then add also a note to mod_authn_db docu that
it is not available on win32.
Steffen
----- Original Message -----
From: "Justin Erenkrantz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <dev@httpd.apache.org>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2005 4:22 PM
Subject: Re: [vote] 2.2.0 tarballs
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 10:16:04AM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote:
mod_dbd is explicitly mentioned as a new feature of 2.2
and, therefore, a compelling reason to upgrade. Either
we stop refering to mod_dbd as something special enough
to warrant special attention as a core enhancement or
we fix it so it *is* one.
The fact that no one has ever cared to make mod_dbd work on Windows until
the precise instance that we're to go to GA is complete evidence that this
is not a showstopper. It's not even in the default build!
It can wait until the next release of 2.2. We can note it in the release
notes and move along. -- justin
