-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Maxime, folks,
On Dec 11, 2005, at 4:45 PM, Maxime Petazzoni wrote:
I'm not yet used to release management (even for a small module like
mod_mbox), so I'll be very pleased to get some feedback, comments and
pointers if we decide to make a 0.2 release for mod_mbox !
Good idea: releasing the code in packaged form should encourage its use.
The main aspect of Release Management is (all IMHO of course) making
an informed judgement of whether the current code base is "good
enough" to release. This includes data points like:
* It's been running on mail-archives.apache.org with fewer than X
cores (with X tending to 0)
* It can be built against httpd release 2.{0,2}.y without
modifications to either httpd, mod_mbox source code or build files
* There is documentation that allows a user (as opposed to the person
who wrote the code) to install it and get started serving mail archives
* There are Z number of open bugs in Bugzilla against the module and
T of those need to be fixed before we can release, while U of them
can be waived
Based on that information we can decide to release and make an
announcememt.
S. (and why 0.2, why not 1.0? What are the criteria for 1.0?)
- --
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.temme.net/sander/
PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFDnPdinjkrwtLH+RIRAjWhAJ9GKiiZL3ve+hwPeJu0tPQE3lhNPwCfV44j
5VH+MgycdHZ9Tw3tmJMQhvE=
=1rEW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
