tis 2006-07-18 klockan 00:47 +0200 skrev Ruediger Pluem: > And this is exactly the question: Is it ok for > the HEAD response to differ from the GET response with respect to T-E > and C-L headers
It's not in case of C-L. For a starter HEAD is used by quite many robots with simplistic caches to verify that the copy they have is current and correct. The RFC is quite strict that entity headers of a HEAD response SHOULD match those of a identical GET request, so difference in C-L is not acceptable by the RFC. (T-E is transport, and may differ) It's a pity T-E gzip isn't deployable. Would eleminate this whole question as it's not an entity transform.. Regards Henrik
signature.asc
Description: Detta är en digitalt signerad meddelandedel
