while we are on the subject to of apr...
May i ask why the lib's have a 1 appended to it in 2.2.x? Most (read nearly all) 3rd party modules link to the old filename.

Jorge

On 11/8/06, Paul Querna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Looking over CHANGES and STATUS, I think we should
> start thinking about a 2.2.4 release. Comments?
> I offer to be RM.

I think we should start thinking about it too.  I think we should also
consider requesting that APR{,-Util} 1.2.8 gets done by the APR
developers...

With the APR hat on, I volunteer to RM a 1.2.x release of APR and
APR-Util.  How does this Saturday as a release cut time sound for everyone?

-Paul




--
~Jorge

Reply via email to