mån 2007-02-12 klockan 17:51 +0000 skrev Nick Kew: > 2. Where there's chunked encoding, the check would best be > implemented in the chunking filter. > > 3. A simple count/abort filter is then a last resort. > And it won't be able to tell the client what's happened, > because the header has already been sent (unless it > buffers the entire response, which is horribly inefficient).
Why differing 2 and 3? What's the benefit of doing it in the chunking filter? Just to avoid having yet another filter in the chain or something besides that? Regards Henrik
signature.asc
Description: Detta är en digitalt signerad meddelandedel
