The behavior is simular to what i've experienced with a few web hosts. both [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] worked on ftp.blackdot.be when i was having my sites hosted by my ISP.
So this sounds great! since that was one of hurdels I hit when trying to implement mod_ftp in my vhost setup. On 4/6/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've given some thought to the desire for mod_ftp to support different host contexts, and came up with this... What about modifying mod_ftp USER directive to accept username in the format of [EMAIL PROTECTED], and tokenize user as the username, host as the http-ish Host: virtual host name? If this feature were enabled, 'USER user' would simply be rejected. Thoughts?
-- ~Jorge
