On mån, 2007-08-27 at 22:00 +0200, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > But without an adjusted conditional checking this leads to a failure > of conditional requests. And I currently do not see how we can adjust > ap_meets_conditions. As I understand 13.3.3 of RFC2616 the DEFLATE_OUT > filter transforms a possible strong ETag of the response it filters > into a weak ETag. So shouldn't we simply transform a strong ETag into > a weak one?
It can still be a strong one provided the server always end up in the same gzip encoding (which it should, when using gzip.. at least unless zlib is upgraded..) Regards Henrik
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
