* Graham Leggett wrote: > André Malo wrote: > >> Is valid in XML? > > > > Given the proper Doctype, sure. > > However, firefox refuses a lot. This does not mean it's not valid. The > > char entity problem is well-known, but invalid (firefox only uses DTDs > > out of the chrome scheme, for whatever reason). The doc build system > > incorporates all HTML char entities and is the authoritative source > > whether a document can be transformed or not. > > The docs at http://httpd.apache.org/docs-project/docsformat.html imply > that modern browsers should work and that an older browser might not, > and when Firefox didn't my first thought was that the XML was at fault, > and not Firefox. > > Is it possible to update this page to clarify that one should always > rely on the reference transformation using Xalan+Xerces because > concluding anything is broken? At the moment, emphasis is placed on > Xalan+Xerces being used to prevent massive diffs only.
Rephrased the browser note a bit. Is it better now? nd -- >>> Muschelflucht-Zusatzeinrichtung. >> Shell-Escape ist ja noch klar, aber `Zusatzeinrichtung'? > extension? Feature. -- gefunden in de.org.ccc
