On tor, 2007-09-27 at 14:08 +0100, Joe Orton wrote: > From the name I'd presume these are testing a long chunk-extension, not > long chunks. There is no 2616 requirement to handle arbitrarily long > chunk-extensions so it's a meaningless test, unless httpd is not failing > appropriately. (the chunk-extension is an optional token which can be > passed after the chunk-size and is never used in practice)
Well, technically there is no bound on the size of the chunk extensions in RFC2616 (same for almost all HTTP stuff, not only chunk extensions), but yes.. Regards Henri
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
