On sön, 2007-11-11 at 12:44 +0000, Nick Kew wrote:

> Note incoming c-l much earlier in the request processing cycle,
> and use that for ap_http_filter?  This would make sense for apps
> that don't require c-l.

Except that you would then need to buffer the whole message to compute
the length..

Another way to deal with such cases is to respond with 411 before 100
Continue, and let the client compute C-L.. This is what the RFC
recommends if it's known the next-hop is HTTP/1.0.

Regards
Henrik

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to