Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group schrieb: > > >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> Von: Paul Querna >> Gesendet: Freitag, 28. November 2008 17:55 >> An: dev@httpd.apache.org >> Betreff: Re: Preferred versions of libtool and autoconf for T&R >> >> Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote: >>> What are our preferred versions of autoconf and libtool for >> T&R on the weekend? >>> As far as I remember autoconf 2.61 had some problems. >> I'm not actually sure now days what specific version should >> be used, I >> haven't done RM in a while :-/ >> >> Just make sure you use a local copy, hand compiled version, not > > That was my plan. Jim what versions did you use last time?
The generated files in the httpd distribution and also in the bundled apr/apr-util tell us it was autoconf 2.61 and libtool 1.5.26. There was a short discussion about autoconf versions and apr and httpd releasing before 2.2.10: http://marc.info/?t=122168206000001&r=1&w=2 The technical reasons for nit chosing 2.62 are contained in the discussion starting with your mail http://marc.info/?l=apr-dev&m=121814441110258&w=2 Regards, Rainer
