Roy T. Fielding wrote:
I don't see a problem with RequireNone inverting the logic, and I think it would actually be useful for blocking a set of bad clients. Is it difficult to include that without MatchNotAny?
Not at all difficult; trivial, in fact. The only reason I took it out as well was the name "inversion" issue. I'll put it back in and commit tomorrow. Might take a few days to deal with the doc adjustments, but otherwise a simple job. Thanks for the comments! Chris. -- GPG Key ID: 366A375B GPG Key Fingerprint: 485E 5041 17E1 E2BB C263 E4DE C8E3 FA36 366A 375B
