On 07/09/2012 09:24 AM, Issac Goldstand wrote: > On 09/07/2012 01:12, Mads Toftum wrote: >> On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 10:33:56PM +0200, Daniel Gruno wrote: >>> [ ] +1: Adopt the comments.a.o system in the 2.2 and 2.4 branch of docs >>> [ ] 0: I don't care >>> [X] -1: Don't adopt the system, because.... >>> >> Only trunk is CTR. >> > Can you explain the rationale of that veto? > Let me reiterate, in case I was being vague earlier on: This is a _majority_ vote issue just like with releases (and like we did with adopting the CMS system for our site), there is no veto, just +1, 0 and -1.
I can, to some extent, understand Mads' reasons for voting -1, but I'd also like some elaboration, so I don't get the wrong impression. Personally, my rationale for adopting it to 2.2 and 2.4 is that _people will use it_ there, which is what we want. I have described this in the wiki proposal a while ago, at http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/DocsCommentSystem and I had really hoped that all the pros and cons had been discussed by now. With regards, Daniel.
