Any others with time to look thru 2.0.65's STATUS file. There are a handful of "showstoppers" that I'm thinking about "deferring" and pushing ahead with the 2.0.65 release.
On Oct 1, 2012, at 8:13 AM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: > I can't recall either, but doing so in conjunction with > the 2.0.65 release likely makes sense. > > On Sep 30, 2012, at 1:39 PM, Daniel Ruggeri <drugg...@primary.net> wrote: > >> On 9/30/2012 10:30 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >>> There was an email on users@httpd that reminded me that 2.0.65 has >>> been long left in a holding pattern. >>> >>> Anyone opposed to me pushing for a 2.0.65 release by the >>> end of this week? >> >> No opposition, but this does remind me about the when-will-2.0-be-EOL >> conversation. I think consensus was 1 year after the first 2.4 release >> but I don't think I've seen such an announcement (I could have just >> missed it, too). >> >> -- >> Daniel Ruggeri >> >
