On Friday 18 January 2013, Jim Jagielski wrote: > t/apache/http_strict.t ....... 1/85 # Failed test 25 in > t/apache/http_strict.t at line 172 fail #15 # Failed test 26 in > t/apache/http_strict.t at line 172 fail #16 > > Should tests really fail when there's no real > failure per se??
Maybe commiting them was a bit premature as the relevant checks in httpd still need to be implemented. I have now commented these two out.
