+1 as long as we make it very obvious that is what it is. A risk is that when a developer is hacking, refreshing, hacking, refreshing they *will* always get the same VM, so they will expect that behavior and be surprised when it is used concurrently.
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Eric Covener <cove...@gmail.com> wrote: > I say go for it, it's an experimental module in 2.4. >