On 28 Apr 2014, at 22:50, Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> wrote:

> Any reason to NOT include
> 
>       http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1332643
>       http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1487772
> 
> in 2.4??

I don't think https://www.imperialviolet.org/2013/03/20/alpn.html is enough 
reason not to backport, but I'll mention it.

-- 
Tim Bannister – [email protected]

Reply via email to