* Luca Toscano wrote: > Hi André! > > 2016-02-24 11:44 GMT+01:00 André Malo <n...@perlig.de>: > > Is there a reason why you reset the banner translations? > > I changed the banner's wording a bit for this use case. From (taking 2.0 > one as reference): > > "This document refers to the 2.0 version of Apache httpd, which is no > longer maintained. Upgrade, and refer to the current version of httpd > instead, documented at:" > > to > > "This document refers to a legacy release (2.2) of Apache httpd. The active > release (2.4) is documented here. If you have not already upgraded, please > follow this link for more information." > > > The 2.2 use case seems a bit different because it is legacy but still > supported, so I thought to add a more conservative message. I consequently > changed the translated banners to avoid confusion, but we might just decide > to go for the "no longer maintained" original option to keep all the > translations.
Ah, didn't get that. Thanks! > Let me know if you want me to amend my change, or just rollback it entirely > to study a better solution. Nah, it's just fine ;) Cheers, nd -- Already I've seen people (really!) write web URLs in the form: http:\\some.site.somewhere [...] How soon until greengrocers start writing "apples $1\pound" or something? -- Joona I Palaste in clc
