On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Yann Ylavic <ylavic....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This would work for me (on the proxy side), too.
> The patch (attached) is a bit longer, but still reasonable IMHO.
> WDYT?
Not understanding if (!header->key) { continue; } - why success if there is
a dead ': UnnamedValue' entry in the output headers table? Unclear why
apr_table_do needed to be re-implemented.
Does it make sense to smash surrounding whitespace here? A single SP
is going to have the same semantic value as multiple SP/TAB characters.
