What pcre lib did you use on CentOS5? The one provided by CentOS or your own?
Regards Rüdiger C2 General Von: Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. März 2019 14:52 An: httpd <dev@httpd.apache.org> Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.39 Yep, CentOS5. Mostly due to the fact that regressions would likely show up more readily on older OSs rather than newer ones. Plus, there's still a crap-ton of systems using CentOS5/RHEL5 On Mar 28, 2019, at 8:51 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group <ruediger.pl...@vodafone.com<mailto:ruediger.pl...@vodafone.com>> wrote: C2 General -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com<mailto:j...@jagunet.com>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. März 2019 13:39 An: httpd <dev@httpd.apache.org<mailto:dev@httpd.apache.org>> Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.39 On Mar 27, 2019, at 11:09 AM, Daniel Ruggeri <drugg...@primary.net<mailto:drugg...@primary.net>> wrote: Hi, all; Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball as 2.4.39: [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are: sha1: e66d6bfea42254e64d3b5009f49ecc486ac46de2 *httpd-2.4.39.tar.gz sha256: 8b95fe249f3a6c50aad3ca125eef3e02d619116cde242e1bc3c266b7b5c37c30 *httpd- 2.4.39.tar.gz -- Daniel Ruggeri Tested and passed on the following systems (no regressions): o macOS 10.14.4, Xcode 10.2 o CentOS 5, 64bit Really CentOS 5? Just asking because it does not receive further OS updates and I wouldn't recommend to use it any longer. Regards Rüdiger
