On 10/1/21 10:40, ste...@eissing.org wrote: > Hi, all; > Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release > this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.50-rc1 as 2.4.50: > [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! > [ ] +0: Let's have a talk. > [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. > > The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are: > sha1: afac1bf6aaa84ea2878c56ed56a49f5efdd7ff73 *httpd-2.4.50-rc1.tar.gz > sha256: feb87f9cc60e02782d795d30cd60a36e918c82fe9a2e7363b0ae28a78be9613a > *httpd-2.4.50-rc1.tar.gz > sha512: > 3b5e06d8428f14bae8173dbb27921496831c7c14c31850d2df0c0d6f69e931bbf0e4e71c6a250b4f5c0d646d1b7da813bbe61711f8a79ab5f80d39dfd176f57c > *httpd-2.4.50-rc1.tar.gz >
+1: It's not just good, it's good with OpenSSL 1.1.1 On ye SPARC64 Solaris 10 server here it seems to work just fine with OpenSSL 1.1.1l and of course it does not work ( yet ) with OpenSSL 3.0.0 and we already know that : beta # /opt/bw/bin/apachectl start httpd: Syntax error on line 99 of /opt/bw/etc/apache/httpd/httpd.conf: Cannot load modules/mod_ssl.so into server: ld.so.1: httpd: fatal: relocation error: file /opt/bw/modules/mod_ssl.so: symbol ERR_GET_FUNC: referenced symbol not found beta # I don't know if trunk is functional and I have not really jumped on trunk in a few weeks and I'll give that a whirl but autoconf/autoreconf autotools madness was giving me hardship. At least last time I looked which was 1893292 about two weeks ago. Anyways 2.4.50 seems to work just fine with OpenSSL 1.1.1l for me. -- Dennis Clarke RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC UNIX and Linux spoken GreyBeard and suspenders optional
