On 1/2/24 14:47, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Yeah, that sounds about right. I'd say that whatever changes need (or should
be) made are fine
Thanks I will keep experimenting ;-)
On Dec 21, 2023, at 1:32 PM, Rainer Jung <rainer.j...@kippdata.de> wrote:
I guess it could be like this: when Mladen originally implemented the by
requests load balancing method in mod_jk he used the count and subtract method
for the counters. He then ported this to mod_proxy_balancer and I think it is
still, how by requests counting woorks there.
There are pros and cons, e.g. in case a worker goes down for some time. A bit
later we switched in mod_jk to a count and divide, where division by 2 was done
roughly every 60 seconds (configurable).
I think the idea of the age method was roughly, that you could implement a
balanvcer method, that registers a mod_watchdog task, that regularly ages the
balancing counters. Aging because you want to give the past a smaller influence
on the balancing decision than the more recent activity.
I hope that's understandable and maybe Jim remembers something similar to that.
Best regards,
Rainer
Am 21.12.23 um 08:23 schrieb jean-frederic clere:
On 12/20/23 21:22, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I'll have to go back through my notes... I do recall adding fields that although
were not being used at the time, were _going to be used_ as some point, and
I didn't want to have to worry about ABI compatibility.
Cool I will wait before implementing something that breaks your design ;-)
On Dec 14, 2023, at 8:27 AM, jean-frederic clere <jfcl...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
Any examples or docs about:
apr_status_t (*age)(proxy_balancer *balancer, server_rec *s);
In struct proxy_balancer_method?
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
