On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 10:30 AM Eric Covener <cove...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 10:19 AM Yann Ylavic <ylavic....@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 3:03 PM Eric Covener <cove...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 8:48 AM Yann Ylavic <ylavic....@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Maybe it could be:
> > > > if (threads_created) {
> > >
> > > not listener_started?
> > >
> > > threads_started>0 could just mean we had no scoreboard issues but
> > > pthread_create failed on anything but the first thread.
> >
> > Don't we want the workers to gracefully stop whenever at least one was
> > created, or we may deadlock in clean_child_exit()?
>
> Yes, I see what you mean now. I will try to force some pthread_create
> errors w/ the patch soon.
It seems like if there is no listener yet, the
signal_threads(ST_GRACEFUL) will fail to interrupt the queue (because
it defers to the woken up listener)
Maybe we do it inline before apr_thread_exit/
--
Eric Covener
cove...@gmail.com
