Thomas,
I'm with the others in that if they truly just wanted to use features, they would simply use the code (under GPL). RoundCube is a real threat to them, in my opinion - and theirs, I am sure. I've never really been a fan of the commercial-with-crippled-open-source-variant model, either.
I'd take them up on the consulting work if they still would offer, though :)
Adam
- Fwd: Roundcube merger - Ideas from atmail Thomas Bruederli
- Re: Fwd: Roundcube merger - Ideas from atmail Vahan Yerkanian
- Re: Fwd: Roundcube merger - Ideas from atmail David Collantes
- Re: Roundcube merger - Ideas from atmail Jason Dixon
- Re: Roundcube merger - Ideas from atmail RutePoint
- Re: Roundcube merger - Ideas from atmail Paul Waring
- Re: Roundcube merger - Ideas from atmail Charles McNulty
- Re: Roundcube merger - Ideas from atmail Randy Noval
- Re: Fwd: Roundcube merger - Ideas from atmail Brett Patterson
- Re: Fwd: Roundcube merger - Ideas from atmail Adam Grelck
- Re: Fwd: Roundcube merger - Ideas from atmail Mark Bucciarelli
- Re: Fwd: Roundcube merger - Ideas from atmail Jon Daley
- Re: Fwd: Roundcube merger - Ideas from atmai... Michael Bueker
- Re: Fwd: Roundcube merger - Ideas from a... Charles McNulty
- Re: Fwd: Roundcube merger - Ideas f... Michael Bueker
- Re: Fwd: Roundcube merger - Ideas from atmail Hans Lellelid
- Re: Roundcube merger - Ideas from atmail richs
- Re: Roundcube merger - Ideas from atmail Jesse Thompson
- Re: Fwd: Roundcube merger - Ideas from atmail Thomas Bruederli
- Re: Fwd: Roundcube merger - Ideas from atmail Michael Bueker
