Am 03/25/17 um 01:30 schrieb Christian Schulte: > Am 03/24/17 um 23:28 schrieb Stephen Connolly: >> Keep in mind that AIUI we aim to be BourneShell compatible in which case $( >> ) is not available > > Thanks for pointing this out. Our launchers have this in the first line: > > #!/bin/sh > > /bin/sh should be a POSIX compatible shell. On the BSDs, OSX and Solaris > (IIRC) this is some kind of ksh. The man page on OpenBSD explicitly > states this: > > This version of sh is actually ksh in disguise. As such, it also > supports the features described in ksh(1). This manual page describes > only the parts relevant to a POSIX compliant sh. If portability is a > concern, use only those features described in this page. > > They provide different man pages for sh and ksh although /bin/sh is ksh. > > http://man.openbsd.org/sh > http://man.openbsd.org/ksh > > Can you provide a link to some BourneShell man page (a real one, not > bash)? We should fix the launchers in 3.5.0 once and for all. > > Currently reading the "Shell & Utilities" volume from here: > > <http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/> > > This is what we should be compatible to. Did not find anything about > "readlink" in there so we should not be using it and find a compliant > solution. > > Regards, >
Seems we really should be using "`pwd -P`" as you suggested. <http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/pwd.html> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
