Am 2017-08-18 um 20:59 schrieb Robert Scholte:
I like the idea of having our own scheme for all projects.
That will also give the option to remove types like "Question"; now once
used we're always asking them to use other ways to get an answer. But it
is an option, so it is kind of valid to use it.
Fully support that (B). "Question" is just annoying.
On Fri, 18 Aug 2017 20:52:55 +0200, Karl Heinz Marbaise
<khmarba...@gmx.de> wrote:
Hi to all,
I have realized that in MASSEMBLY it is possible to define an issue
Type "Dependency Upgrade" which is very feasible for our projects...
So I have asked INFRA[1] if we could have that for our other JIRA
projects as well....So the now we can decide between three options:
A) switch your other schemes to match MASSEMBLY - meaning in addition
to getting 'Dependency Upgrade' you also get add additional 30+ others
you dont use.
B) Create a Maven Issue Type Scheme, adding 'Dependency Upgrade' to
the default.
C) Nothing.
So I would vote for option "B" ...The question is what do you think?
Which options would you like to use in JIRA ?
Kind regards
Karl Heinz Marbaise
More details in the issue.
[1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-14898
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
