Vincent Siveton wrote:
Hi Lukas,
2007/8/27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Author: ltheussl
Date: Mon Aug 27 03:45:20 2007
New Revision: 570064
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=570064&view=rev
Log:
Align sandbox poms
Modified:
maven/sandbox/trunk/doxia/doxia-book/pom.xml
maven/sandbox/trunk/doxia/doxia-editor/pom.xml
maven/sandbox/trunk/doxia/doxia-linkcheck/pom.xml
maven/sandbox/trunk/doxia/doxia-maven-plugin/pom.xml
maven/sandbox/trunk/doxia/doxia-module-mediawiki/pom.xml
maven/sandbox/trunk/doxia/pom.xml
Modified: maven/sandbox/trunk/doxia/doxia-book/pom.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/sandbox/trunk/doxia/doxia-book/pom.xml?rev=570064&r1=570063&r2=570064&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- maven/sandbox/trunk/doxia/doxia-book/pom.xml (original)
+++ maven/sandbox/trunk/doxia/doxia-book/pom.xml Mon Aug 27 03:45:20 2007
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--
Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
@@ -25,12 +25,12 @@
<modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>
<parent>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.doxia</groupId>
- <artifactId>doxia</artifactId>
+ <artifactId>doxia-sandbox</artifactId>
<version>1.0-alpha-9-SNAPSHOT</version>
</parent>
IMHO it is better to use doxia parent instead of doxia-sandbox.
It should be more easy to promote them.
Is it? I just wanted to unify the deps since some modules used doxia,
some doxia-sandbox. But since we already have a doxia-sandbox parent
pom, and it extends doxia, I thought we should use it. Wouldn't it risk
confusion eg if we deploy sites for sandbox components that don't have
"sandbox" somewhere in their id?
-Lukas
[snip]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
