> On Jan. 28, 2015, 10:17 a.m., Niklas Nielsen wrote:
> > src/slave/slave.cpp, line 132
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/30074/diff/3/?file=828310#file828310line132>
> >
> >     You don't have to initialize Option types with None. They will 
> > automatically be that :)
> 
> Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
>     This is more explicit though. Do we have an agreement for such cases?

Feel free to drop - think we do both: 
https://github.com/apache/mesos/blob/master/src/slave/slave.cpp#L127 vs 
https://github.com/apache/mesos/blob/master/src/slave/slave.hpp#L406


- Niklas


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/30074/#review70029
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Jan. 21, 2015, 5:55 a.m., Alexander Rojas wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/30074/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 21, 2015, 5:55 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Niklas Nielsen and Till Toenshoff.
> 
> 
> Bugs: mesos-2229
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/mesos-2229
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Adds and entry `max_allowed_age` to the response of the stats.json endpoint 
> in the slave. The format of the value is `{double}(days|mins|secs)`.
> 
> The max allowed age value is available only if it is set, which depends on 
> the flag `--disk_watch_interval` which by default runs every minute (So it 
> will only be available after the first minute running).
> 
> Modifies the unit test `SlaveTest.MetricsInStatsEndpoint` so it takes into 
> account the new entry.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/http.cpp d1cf8a6 
>   src/slave/slave.hpp 70bd8c1 
>   src/slave/slave.cpp fca83b3 
>   src/tests/slave_tests.cpp a85a028 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30074/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alexander Rojas
> 
>

Reply via email to