High five! > On Jan 21, 2016, at 12:40 AM, Michael Park <mcyp...@gmail.com> wrote: > > `void` parameters are no longer with us. > > https://github.com/apache/mesos/commit/93a5708294d6d66a5e1350a0bb1c8fe87605ee1d > https://github.com/apache/mesos/commit/05f9fb2fa66968f37418d28fc8cebd0770a54dca > https://github.com/apache/mesos/commit/4d4d7166414f0ebd8d5e40df34070446098a3c91 > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 5:36 AM Alexander Rojas <alexan...@mesosphere.io> > wrote: > >> +1 >> >>> On 13 Dec 2015, at 19:46, Michael Park <mp...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> In the C++ world, the *void* parameter is considered to be only there >> for C >>> compatibility reasons. >>> >>> We do a good job of not using *void *parameters in function declarations, >>> e.g., *void F();*. On the other hand, we're *not* so good doing so for >>> function types, e.g., *std::function<void(void)>*. >>> >>> I would like to see the codebase converge to *not* use *void* as a >>> parameter type, and would like feedback if anyone holds strong opposing >>> opinions. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> MPark. >> >>
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
