[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-16?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12465404
]
Julien Vermillard commented on DIRMINA-16:
------------------------------------------
so far I understand MINA's behaviour, it's looking like a good solution, and
going to a simplify a little
> org.apache.mina.common.TransportType
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: DIRMINA-16
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-16
> Project: MINA
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Environment: Improve TransportType for permit to extend MINA
> supported transport types
> Reporter: Julien Vermillard
> Assigned To: Trustin Lee
> Fix For: 0.7
>
>
> the TransportType define the differents TransportType in MINA
> (Socket,Datagram, VM Pipe). The types are static and hardcoded. The
> constructor of Transport type is private. It leave no room for new Transport.
> I propose :
> 1st : change the transportType constructor visibility to public
> 2snd : move the staticly defined TransportTypes to the different io.datagram,
> io.socket, etc.. packages
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
