It should be as simple as possible to use Mina. Splitting basic functionality into separate packages (e.g. core + ByteBuffer) is IMO not the way to go. I can understand the need for a separate ByteBuffer package, but I don't see why that should affect every Mina user.
(yes, it's almost splitting hairs ... but I still think it's an important decision :-) -- Jeroen Brattinga 2007/2/20, Alex Karasulu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Without sounding like my 5 year old :), but why not? Could you give more reasons than just your opinion?
