Hi I was expecting a response :-). Think I put the question in a wrong way. My current proxy implementation is based on the proxy example provided with MINA. Its working fine as I am dealing with String requests and responses only. I have integrated JMX successfully and it rocks. Now moving along, I need to deal with serialized java objects as requests and responses and my proxy is going to sit in the middle , passing on those objects to and fro. Right now I am using the proxy to sit in between the sumup client and server provided in the example code. Though the proxy is invoked, but I am not able to pass on the java objects around. When I do a getObject(on the ByteBuffer) on ClientToProxyIoHandler's sessionOpened() method I get a BufferUnderflowException.I don't want to deserialize the objects (as done in the sumup example) as this will add an amount of latency. I am doing the deserialization ascyncrously using another framework. Will really appreciate a response.
Regds Monajit -----Original Message----- From: Monajit Choudhury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 5:00 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: Proxy server using Mina Hi Thanks for the response. Right now I am passing around String literals only.But I want to pass around serialized java objects, and the proxy should be able to trap it and store the objects, something like that. I have seen the sumup application in the example pakg, which passes around java objects. But I am not able to do the same with the proxy implementation.Is there a direct way of doing it without using the bytebuffer? Regds Monajit -----Original Message----- From: Mark Webb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thu 2/22/2007 11:44 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Proxy server using Mina so you are using the same acceptor to service the 200-300 ports? I would think that this would work, since an acceptor would have to handle the same data if it were all coming in on the same port. It certainly would not hurt to try and test your system with more than one acceptor though, just keep in mind that things would get more complex in your proxy when you add more acceptors and connectors. Let us know how things work out for you. On 2/22/07, Monajit Choudhury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi > I am new to MINA. I have a scenario where in I need to write a > tunneling proxy which listens to client requests does some processing on > the request and passes it on to the server. Now my question is, this > proxy needs to listen to 200 to 300 ports simultaneously. Right now I > am testing it out using the Proxy code provided in the examples. I am > creating 200 to 300 clientHandlers(1 per port), 1 IoConnector and 1 > IoAcceptor to handle the requests.Is this the right approach or there > is a better way to do it. Please advise. > > Regds > Monajit > > > > -- ..Cheers Mark
