What ever happened to Coconut over at Codehaus? I guess it's dead.
I don't think there is anything out there that is as coherent, performant and easy to use as MINA. Alex On 3/6/07, Mark Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The only thing that comes to mind is ACE. There is a java version of ACE ( http://cvs.doc.wustl.edu/JACE/), but I know nothing about it. On 3/6/07, Harold Combs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Justin, > > I know of no OpenSource implementation, but one (rather old) idea that > seems > similar to MINA is the Conduits+ framework: > > http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/23071.html > http://www.glue.ch/~hueni/conduits/ > > The similarity, to me, is a well-defined black box (favoring composition > and > configuration) framework, that's plastic enough to implement any protocol. > > However, since there's no reference implementation, imagine doing MINA > with > no examples, and no API docs aside from the 'At a Glance' diagram found in > the powerpoints! > > -Harold > > > > On 3/5/07, Stanczak Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Just wondering, but what are the head-to-head, so to speak, equals to > > MINA? Like I was thinking MINA vs. JBoss Remoting, but they're not the > > same, correct? > > > > -- > > Justin Stanczak > > Stanczak Group > > 812-735-3600 > > > > "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do > > nothing." > > Edmund Burke > > > > > -- ..Cheers Mark
