Is this data that is going to each port the same? Or are some ports getting more data than others?
You might be able to share acceptors across different ports. On 3/6/07, Monajit Choudhury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Its throughput. Sorry for the spell mistake :-). And the sample size was about 10,000. Regds Monajit -----Original Message----- From: Monajit Choudhury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2007 4:33 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Low thoroughput Hi I was testing the throughput of the sumpup example using apache jmeter. I am using 100 threads with loop forever set to true.I get a throughput of about 99/sec.But when I use the proxy(provided in the example)in between the sumup client and the server, the throughput drops to about 60/sec.The proxy as of now uses 1 acceptor,1 connector and 1 clienthandler per port. Is this a good approach or should I increase the number of acceptors and connectors? PS: I am using my laptop to run the tests, so don't expect a very high performance. What I am looking for is the % increase in latency added by the proxy. Regds Monajit
-- ..Cheers Mark
