Hi Gaston, I was wondering if you ran into memory problems when writes rates>>read rates -> for example in case of broadcasting an incoming message to multiple clients\users ? Did you use some kind of throttling ? With the default out of the box Mina behavior - in such cases - you ran into Out of memory error problems. Thanks
Gaston Dombiak wrote: > > Hey Stefano, > > Two weeks ago I ran another load test round and we got to 54K this time. > We stopped there not because the server was not able to handle more but > because out load generator tool was not able to generate more load. Also > note that the test was not about opening sockets but about having all > those connections sending traffic every second. IIRC, we got peaks of > 9.5K XML stanzas being sent from the server to the clients in one > second. > > Regards, > > -- Gato > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Stefano Bagnara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 11:30 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: MINA performance >> >> Openfire (formerly Wildfire) switched to MINA and they claim to > support >> 25K users or even more. >> >> http://www.igniterealtime.org/forum/thread.jspa?threadID=23728 >> >> Stefano >> >> Nguyen Huy Binh ha scritto: >> > Hi, >> > I am looking for a framework for my server. It has to process many >> > connections concurrently (about 10,000 client). Can MINA perform > that >> job? >> > I saw MINA presentation, you showed a performance test with a huge > of >> > messages on 10 clients. >> > Does MINA have a infrastructure (like thread-pool) to solve that >> problem? >> > >> > Is there any live-example using MINA for the same purpose? >> > >> > Thank you. >> > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/MINA-performance-tf3454944.html#a9657922 Sent from the mina dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
