Well three months later I finally have created the JIRA issue: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-143
sean On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 09:19:30 +0100, Thomas Spiegl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Get the latest cvs-head-version of myfaces. The JspTilesViewHandlerImpl > renderView changed as follows. > Only pages defined in the tiles-config will be rendered using > tiles-support. All other pages are getting renderd as well (ignoring tiles). > > > Curently you are not really > > able to have a tiles definition with a '.' character in the name of > > the definition and still have it work with this class. The class ... > > cann you please add a Jira tracker at > http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/secure/BrowseProject.jspa?id=10600 > > regards, thomas > > > Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > > >Sean, > > > >there exists an work around. Define a > >tiles-definition for *every* jsf page you want to render. > > > >HTH, > >Matthias > > > > > > > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 4:16 PM > >>To: MyFaces Development > >>Subject: Another Enhancement: JspTilesViewHandlerImpl > >> > >> > >>If you're using this class, there seems to be a significant > >>limitation. That is that every page that is mapped to your > >>faces servlet (ie. those with *.faces) must be inside a tile > >>definition. It is impossible to call the faces page directly > >>without embedding it in a tile. > >> > >>If you're using tiles to begin with, its true that a good > >>90-95% of your pages will be in a tiles definition. There > >>are instances, however, when I access a page directly without > >>a layout. Its impossible to do this if the page you want > >>uses faces, b/c JspTilesViewHandlerImpl expects the initial > >>HTTP request to map to a tiles def. > >> > >>sean > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >