If we're going to do a general release based on the current svn, I've already run into one blocker issue that I'm still trying to track down.
1.1.0 (just tested it) and before (Aug 16 snapshot for sure) both had working inputCalendar renderAsPopup="true"behavior. However, the Sep 18th nightly and current svn have broken behavior (no js popup when you click the button). I'm trying to figure out how and where it broke between 1.1.0 and Sept 18th. On 9/23/05, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I will start on the change that I proposed in the other thread. We > can always roll it back if there are a lot of -1. > > Also, I asked this is the other thread but I should've asked you here, > did you branch off the 1.1.0 tag or latest trunk? > > It matters because the fix is in the trunk already and we'll have a > conflict. No big deal but we just need to be on the same page. > > sean > > > > On 9/23/05, Bill Dudney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Totally agree that we should not shoot ourselves in the foot again. > > > > The branches are complete and I have a fix in place on the branch. > > > > I added a tags and branches directory to the release dir > > > > release/ > > tags/ > > 1_1_0 <- is what we released > > branches/ > > 1_1_0 <- is what I've fixed and and we will build our > > release from > > > > Once we are sure that we have a good build we can create a new tag > > > > release/tags/1_1_0_1 > > > > I've run the simple app with the 3 constituent jar files and myfaces- > > all and what I've tested is working. > > > > TTFN, > > > > TTFN, > > > > -bd- > > > > On Sep 23, 2005, at 11:24 AM, Sean Schofield wrote: > > > > > OK just found this thread from yesterday afternoon. Man if you leave > > > your computer for a few hours I guess you miss a lot of action! > > > > > > We definitely should run the TCK before releasing and we should test > > > everything (for real this time) and vote. This wil take about a week > > > but we rushed things last time and look what it got us into ... > > > > > > I agree the problem is urgent but somehow we managed to shoot > > > ourselves in the foot again with the release. This time it was > > > announcing the TCK passage before we had a release candidate. This > > > created the sense of urgency to get the new release out and > > > apprarently we did not test things very thoroughly. > > > > > > In the meantime we could put something on the website explaining that > > > myfaces-all.jar doesn't work and to use impl, api and tomahawk instead > > > for now. We can also promise an upcoming release soon. Perhaps we > > > could do a release candidate later today once Bill is finished with > > > the branch and fixes. > > > > > > sean > > > > > > On 9/23/05, Bill Dudney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> checked into the trunk > > >> > > >> Thanks Martin! > > >> > > >> -bd- > > >> On Sep 23, 2005, at 6:16 AM, Martin Marinschek wrote: > > >> > > >> > > >>> You are right - no question. > > >>> > > >>> we should definitely rerun the TCK if possible. > > >>> > > >>> Oliver is on holidays, remains Manfred to do so... > > >>> > > >>> Manfred? > > >>> > > >>> ;) > > >>> > > >>> regards, > > >>> > > >>> Martin > > >>> > > >>> On 9/23/05, Bill Dudney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>> Hi All, > > >>>> > > >>>> This is the essence of what I fixed. I've rebuilt and used the > > >>>> myfaces-all.jar in the the 'simple.war' test application and > > >>>> everything I tested worked. > > >>>> > > >>>> Instead of 'dist-all' use 'release'. > > >>>> > > >>>> The only problem I see with this approach is that we could > > >>>> introduce > > >>>> unintended consequences by releasing from the trunk (see my > > >>>> response > > >>>> to Sean just moments ago). We can't be 100% sure that no one has > > >>>> committed a TCK breaking change since the release went out so in > > >>>> theory we should rerun the tests before pushing out a new > > >>>> release. If > > >>>> we make the change in a branch then we can more easily assert that > > >>>> nothing has changed except the build file. > > >>>> > > >>>> My $0.02 worth and I'm not against a release from the trunk its > > >>>> just > > >>>> another level of risk. > > >>>> > > >>>> TTFN, > > >>>> > > >>>> -bd- > > >>>> > > >>>> Theoretically we should be doing a patch to the release branch and > > >>>> releasing from there (with the -Dskip.sandbox=true that Bruno > > >>>> mentions). > > >>>> On Sep 23, 2005, at 5:57 AM, Bruno Aranda wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>>> Remember to release without the sandbox. In theory you should use > > >>>>> 'ant > > >>>>> -Dskip.sandbox=true dist-all', but that is the origin of the > > >>>>> bug. I > > >>>>> cannot look at it right now... > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Bruno > > >>>>> > > >>>>> 2005/9/23, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> Bill, > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> please go ahead and check in what you have got now. If you do it > > >>>>>> anytime during the next hour, I will go ahead and prepare a new > > >>>>>> release from this so that we get this faces-config problem out > > >>>>>> of the > > >>>>>> world as fast as possible! > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> regards, > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Martin > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> On 9/22/05, Bill Dudney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> I have a lot of other changes related to the cactus/cargo stuff. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> I don't have a problem checking in all that but there has not > > >>>>>>> been > > >>>>>>> much discussion about it yet. I'd rather see some discussion > > >>>>>>> happen > > >>>>>>> before I check in the rest of the changes. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> TTFN, > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> -bd- > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> On Sep 22, 2005, at 1:38 PM, Mike Kienenberger wrote: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> It's got to be checked into the trunk at some point. I don't > > >>>>>>>> see any > > >>>>>>>> advantages in waiting. > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> On 9/22/05, Bill Dudney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> OTOH, I could checkin everything including the cactus & cargo > > >>>>>>>>> changes > > >>>>>>>>> and that would fix things on the trunk. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Thoughts? > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> -bd- > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> On Sep 22, 2005, at 1:25 PM, Bill Dudney wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> No I've not checked it in yet because I'm waiting for > > >>>>>>>>>> discussion on > > >>>>>>>>>> the idea of making a 1_1_0 branch that we could do the > > >>>>>>>>>> emergency > > >>>>>>>>>> release from. > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> TTNF, > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> -bd- > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> On Sep 22, 2005, at 1:20 PM, Mike Kienenberger wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Is this supposed to be fixed in svn? > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> I just did a complete checkout about an hour ago, and built > > >>>>>>>>>>> it with > > >>>>>>>>>>> "ant dist-all" and I'm getting the error below if I use > > >>>>>>>>>>> myfaces- > > >>>>>>>>>>> all, > > >>>>>>>>>>> but not if I use myfaces.api, myfaces.impl, and tomahawk > > >>>>>>>>>>> separately. > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/myfaces/config/ > > >>>>>>>>>>> FacesConfigurator > > >>>>>>>>>>> at > > >>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.myfaces.webapp.StartupServletContextListener.init > > >>>>>>>>>>> Fa > > >>>>>>>>>>> ce > > >>>>>>>>>>> s > > >>>>>>>>>>> (StartupServletContextListener.java:63) > > >>>>>>>>>>> at > > >>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.myfaces.webapp.StartupServletContextListener.cont > > >>>>>>>>>>> ex > > >>>>>>>>>>> tI > > >>>>>>>>>>> nit > > >>>>>>>>>>> ia > > >>>>>>>>>>> lized(StartupServletContextListener.java:46) > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Or is this a case of the cure being worse than the disease? > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> -Mike > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> On 9/22/05, Bill Dudney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Since this is simply a build problem perhaps we could copy > > >>>>>>>>>>>> the tag > > >>>>>>>>>>>> 1_1_0 to a branch and update only the build.xml file then > > >>>>>>>>>>>> build a > > >>>>>>>>>>>> new > > >>>>>>>>>>>> release. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> This would be simple, quick and more or less safe. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Would we have to rerun the TCK? As long as we trust our > > >>>>>>>>>>>> tag it > > >>>>>>>>>>>> should > > >>>>>>>>>>>> be fine. Correct? > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> TTFN, > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> -bd- > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 22, 2005, at 12:08 PM, Werner Punz wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Bruno Aranda wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is causing many troubles to users now as we can see > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> from > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> questions in the list. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> faces-config.xml is not included in the build because of > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> MYFACES-598, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> when passing -Dskip.sandbox to the build process the file > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is not > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> included. I think this is important enough and we > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> should do > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> something > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> about this. I don't know if it is possible to include the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> file > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> current release but I don't think it is good to > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> development to > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> touch > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> an already released thing. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> My opinion here is that we should release a maintenance > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> release > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.1.1 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> as soon as possible. Waiting for thoughts on this. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bruno > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I cannot vote yet, but due to the fact that many newbys > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> probably > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> will try to use the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> new release, due to the non beta status and TCK status, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> and this > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> is really a showstopper for many, I´d say get the fix > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> out ASAP! > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> -- > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> http://www.irian.at > > >>>>>> Your JSF powerhouse - > > >>>>>> JSF Trainings in English and German > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> -- > > >>> > > >>> http://www.irian.at > > >>> Your JSF powerhouse - > > >>> JSF Trainings in English and German > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > >
