Also I don't think we've even checked in single fix into the branch yet. So we're only talking one or two fixes that weren't already in the trunk.
sean On 9/28/05, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The plan was to do a release candidate over the weekend after using > the rest of this week to fix last minute "must fix" bugs. We could > move that up a bit. What if we build the RC on Friday? That gives us > through tomorrow to fix everything that needs to go in. > > Once we build the RC we can merge the fixes down. The users of the > nightly build will only be without these fixes for a few days. > > sean > > On 9/28/05, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Honestly, I just think we should push this one out. > > > > there have been 64 issues fixed since 1.1.0, that should be enough. > > > > regards, > > > > Martin > > > > On 9/28/05, Bill Dudney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > problem is that merging is a pain in the neck. we can do it its just > > > a pain > > > > > > So we need to push out the release sooner rather than later. > > > > > > I've not seen any discussion on the bug list to get fixed. > > > > > > TTFN, > > > > > > -bd- > > > On Sep 28, 2005, at 2:11 AM, Mathias Brökelmann wrote: > > > > > > > IMO it´s better if we fix a bug in both trunk and the branch. Trunk is > > > > used by more users (either by svn or through the nightlies). This will > > > > give us more feedback if a bugfix introduces a new bug. > > > > > > > > 2005/9/28, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > > >> Bugs that have been introduced on the branch (ex. MYFACES-634) should > > > >> obviously be fixed on the branch. > > > >> > > > >> Additional Rule of thumb: If the bug is going to be fixed in the > > > >> branch fix it *only* in the branch. Do not fix in the trunk. We > > > >> will > > > >> merge into the trunk in a few weeks when we are done. > > > >> > > > >> sean > > > >> > > > >> On 9/27/05, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> I changed all of the issues fixed in nightly to be version 1.1.1 (by > > > >>> renaming the existing nightly version in JIRA and creating a new > > > >>> one.) > > > >>> > > > >>> So we can now search on a list of things that are fixed in that > > > >>> version and eventually generate release notes. > > > >>> > > > >>> Thanks Bill for the branch (its tedious - I know.) > > > >>> > > > >>> sean > > > >>> > > > >>> On 9/27/05, Bill Dudney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>>> branch created > > > >>>> > > > >>>> If you want a bug to be fixed in the 1_1_1 release you must apply > > > >>>> your changes to the release/branches/1_1_1 branch in SVN. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Please limit the changes to the ones identified in the other thread > > > >>>> titled '[proposal] Branch Content'. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Thanks! > > > >>>> > > > >>>> -bd- > > > >>>> > > > >>>> On Sep 27, 2005, at 10:21 AM, Sean Schofield wrote: > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>>> Go for it. > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> sean > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> On 9/27/05, Bill Dudney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>>> Hi Sean, > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> I need about 30 more minutes to finish up something. I'll > > > >>>>>> start the > > > >>>>>> branch around 1:00 EST. Is that OK with everyone? > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> TTFN, > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> -bd- > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Mathias > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > http://www.irian.at > > Your JSF powerhouse - > > JSF Trainings in English and German > > >
