On 12/23/05, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry for stepping into this discussion so late. > > -0.5 on having a "hard" dependency of jsf-api to an external logging api > At least Craigs issue must be assured: developers should be able to > compile their custom components against jsf-api without having the > need for extra libs (commons-logging). Is this guaranteed if we only > use commons-logging within methods and there is no public/protected > API dependency in jsf-api?
Yes, this is guaranteed. -- Adam > If yes, I'm -0 on that. >
